37signals and Divergent Reality 2

Posted by Toby Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:17:00 GMT

I was just reading about In/Out, 37signals’ internal Twitter clone over on their blog and it struck me how they sometimes mutilate context in their writings. First of all, DHH knows the Twitter guys well. Second of all, they didn’t even mention that it was inspired by Twitter and even went so far as to refute this in the comments. I guess a place that’s know for its “creativity” has to keep up the appearances of being innovative…

UPDATE: Apparently, as the comments state, I am wrong about this. My bad. Nevermind this post.

Books and books 3

Posted by Toby Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:51:00 GMT

I just cleaned up the back room last night. Looks like its time for bookshelf #3 ;-)

Is AppEngine Python's Rails? 4

Posted by Toby Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:22:00 GMT

I was thinking about AppEngine some more today and it occurred to me that not only could AppEngine be responsible for a lot of people learning/using Python, but it very well might be Python’s answer to Rails. Its so-called “killer app”, if you will.

Up until this point, Python has been plagued with multiple, competing Web frameworks all taking some mindshare and there really hasn’t been a strong rallying point in the Python Web community like Rails. It appears that Django has been winning out in the blogosphere lately, but its nothing like Rails’ devout following in Ruby-land.

However, with AppEngine, Google does Rails one better: instead of just making it easy to code your app, they make it just as easy as Rails to code and dirt simple to deploy and reduce the operation maintenance to near zero. The need for things like ActiveRecord and migrations is pretty reduced in the AppEngine environment, as is all but a tiny knowledge of SQL (called GQL in that realm). That’s really, really attractive if you’re a Web consultancy shop that’s looking to turn over clients as fast as possible or a side project with a mandate for speed, quality and low cost. To me, that seems like it would be worth learning a little Python for.

AppEngine is pretty clearly aimed at Facebook’s F8 platform but it could end up hitting Python with a major boost in popularity as an aside. I bet Guido is smiling all the way to the bank on this one…

Google AppEngine Thoughts 1

Posted by Toby Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:54:00 GMT

I just read a little bit about the recent announcement of Google AppEngine and I think its a pretty good service overall for certain kinds of Web applications. Unlike the rumors that were floating about prior to its announcement, its not a competitor to AWS directly, nor even a competitor to Ning as some have also claimed. To me, it seems more directly in competition with Heroku if such a thing could even be said. It is clearly based on Bigtable, though, so that part of the rumor appears to have been true.

Being so simple has some advantages and presents some interesting constraints. Because you don’t have root and can’t run the “box” yourself, you’re forced to think simply about the app itself. This seems as if it would be quite a welcome constraint for a lot of Web developers who don’t care about running a network. But the constraint really serves to enable Google-style scalability at its heart. As well, the use of CGI allows Google to run your code wherever they deem it best at the moment underneath, without you having to care about that sort of thing. This is something they already do quite well.

As well, the lack of a traditional RDBMS is something that obviously works well in a shared-nothing environment and makes a lot of sense since Google’s infrastructure is already based on such. This gives real credence to the idea that the RDBMS isn’t the be-all-end-all and will introduce a lot of developers out there to this new way of thinking.

A few things I don’t like:

  • Users of an AppEngine app must login with Google Accounts
  • You do have to upload your Python source to Google and this leads to obvious privacy and IP concerns
  • No recurring job scheduling (essential for lots of different kinds of apps)

One more obvious thing is that an application built on AppEngine is one that is much, much easier for Google to acquire than one that is not. Don’t underestimate that piece of it, as its likely this service will be a loss-leader for Google.

Finally, I think this announcement will be very good for Python. As AppEngine only supports Python right now and for the foreseeable future, anyone interested in AppEngine will have to learn some Python. This will shed some more light on Python for people who might not have otherwise given it a try.

UPDATE: Apparently, others agree about the acquisition potential of apps on AppEngine. Good stuff.

Twitter and me 1

Posted by Toby Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:02:00 GMT

I’ve been using Twitter for some time now and I post to Twitter orders of magnitude more than I post to this blog. With my blog, I don’t feel like I should post something unless I have something interesting or funny to say that others would like to spend some time reading. However, Twitter makes it easy to just post whatever I’m doing or thinking at any random time, reply to other’s conversations, keep up on what’s going on with friends, etc.

I really like the Twitter model, too, in that there are some very interesting constraints:

  • messages are 140 characters or less
  • Twitter auto-shortens links with tinyurl
  • no embedded audio/video (I’m looking at you, Pownce)
  • very simple network model (follow and be followed)

Twitter’s been the whipping post of the Internet for the past year because they had some well-known scaling issues and this was incorrectly blamed on their underlying Web framework, Ruby on Rails. Twitter’s got some things going for it as far as an interesting example of scaling, though, in that the model is so simple. I’ve been playing around in my mind with designing a Twitter clone in Erlang or Stackless with no RDBMS just as a mental exercise. More on that if it ever becomes concrete-er-ish.

In any case, my blog isn’t going to die for a while but if you really want to keep up with every little thing with me you should follow me on Twitter ;-)

Me as a D&D Character

Posted by Toby Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:56:00 GMT

Here’s my D&D character. What are you?

I Am A: True Neutral Elf Sorcerer/Rogue (3rd/2nd Level)

Ability Scores:
Strength-12
Dexterity-14
Constitution-13
Intelligence-17
Wisdom-12
Charisma-14

Alignment:
True Neutral A true neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. He doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most true neutral characters exhibit a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil after all, he would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, he’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some true neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. True neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion. However, true neutral can be a dangerous alignment because it represents apathy, indifference, and a lack of conviction.

Race:
Elves are known for their poetry, song, and magical arts, but when danger threatens they show great skill with weapons and strategy. Elves can live to be over 700 years old and, by human standards, are slow to make friends and enemies, and even slower to forget them. Elves are slim and stand 4.5 to 5.5 feet tall. They have no facial or body hair, prefer comfortable clothes, and possess unearthly grace. Many others races find them hauntingly beautiful.

Primary Class:
Sorcerers are arcane spellcasters who manipulate magic energy with imagination and talent rather than studious discipline. They have no books, no mentors, no theories just raw power that they direct at will. Sorcerers know fewer spells than wizards do and acquire them more slowly, but they can cast individual spells more often and have no need to prepare their incantations ahead of time. Also unlike wizards, sorcerers cannot specialize in a school of magic. Since sorcerers gain their powers without undergoing the years of rigorous study that wizards go through, they have more time to learn fighting skills and are proficient with simple weapons. Charisma is very important for sorcerers; the higher their value in this ability, the higher the spell level they can cast.

Secondary Class:
Rogues have little in common with each other. While some – maybe even the majority – are stealthy thieves, many serve as scouts, spies, investigators, diplomats, and simple thugs. Rogues are versatile, adaptable, and skilled at getting what others don’t want them to get. While not equal to a fighter in combat, a rogue knows how to hit where it hurts, and a sneak attack can dish out a lot of damage. Rogues also seem to have a sixth sense when it comes to avoiding danger. Experienced rogues develop nearly magical powers and skills as they master the arts of stealth, evasion, and sneak attacks. In addition, while not capable of casting spells on their own, a rogue can sometimes ‘fake it’ well enough to cast spells from scrolls, activate wands, and use just about any other magic item.

Find out What Kind of Dungeons and Dragons Character Would You Be?, courtesy of Easydamus (e-mail)

Philly Emerging Tech 2008 Wrapup

Posted by Toby Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:07:00 GMT

Wow, this year’s ETE was even better than last year. A bigger crowd, a better venue and great speakers made this year the best yet. I can’t wait for next years! There’s a lot of cool stuff going on around the Philly area that you’d never know if it weren’t for events like this. E.g. did you know MapQuest is located in Lancaster, PA? I had no idea until yesterday.

In other conference news, my talk yesterday went pretty well. People seemed to really enjoy it and the room was full. You can view my talk slides on Hadoop on my talks page along with my other slides from previous talks (including last year’s ETE talk on Comet).

Thanks to Chariot for putting on another excellent event, in particular Tracey Welson-Rossman and her merry band of awesome facilitators! Keep it going for next year :)

I'm Speaking at Philly ETech 2008

Posted by Toby Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:55:00 GMT

I’m speaking about Hadoop today at 4PM EDT at the Philadelphia Emerging Technologies for the Enterprise conference. Its located at Drexel University. Come on down if you can make it; the speaker list is great and I’m sure it will be a great time for all!

Hello, Invite Media! 3

Posted by Toby Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:58:00 GMT

After taking some time off and assessing my options, I’ve accepted the post of Chief Architect at Invite Media out here in Philadelphia. They are an early stage startup still in stealth mode and they are doing some off-the-wall cool stuff. I’m really excited to be working with such a great team of people and looking forward to helping them out in any way I can.

NYC.rb Hackfest

Posted by Toby Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:06:00 GMT

I went up to Manhattan last night to attend the monthly NYC.rb Hackfest and it was pretty awesome! Lots of great people and conversation was had. I highly recommend checking it out if you get a chance to head up there.

Older posts: 1 2 3 ... 13